From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 26 04:21:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE7E16A403 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@utzweb.net) Received: from marley.grokthis.net (marley.grokthis.net [69.93.78.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857C743D49 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:21:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@utzweb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (c-71-197-214-178.hsd1.or.comcast.net [71.197.214.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by marley.grokthis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19E1F1026 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:21:00 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org From: John Utz Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:20:58 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: smbios.ko probes successfully if i disable acpi sysresource, fails if i do not X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:21:01 -0000 Hello; as you may know i am attempting to use fbsd's smbios functionality to support porting the linux i8k-utils dell smbios keyboard and fan stuff. i just discovered today that disabling sysresource allows the module to attach. so, here's the part that i'd love some help with understanding: 1. with acpi enabled, is smbios.ko supposed to be asking acpi for a resource handle or something? 2. is acpi_resource.c behaving in error? should it not be consuming the smbios startaddr? note that startaddr for smbios is 0xf000, bios.c looks for pnpbios and pcibios starting at 0xe000 and completely ignores smbios. it seems to me that either statement 1 or 2 is correct, but not both. of course, i could be totally wrong, can anybody enlighten me? tnx! johnu