From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 06:55:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5530816A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:55:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CB4743D48 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:55:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 10291 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 06:55:52 -0000 Received: from maxwell2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.192) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 06:55:52 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.23]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20051106065552.OJIC28012.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:55:52 +0800 Message-ID: <436DA8E4.8020109@pacific.net.sg> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:55:32 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051008) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KIMURA Yasuhiro References: <1131176568.3960.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> <20051106.154938.00425730.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106.154938.00425730.yasu@utahime.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GNOME 2.12.1 has been merged into the ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:55:56 -0000 Hi, KIMURA Yasuhiro wrote: > > But It is good time for me (and for other 4.x users probably) to > consider the migration from 4.x to 5.3 or 6.0 because one of most either go to 5.4 or wait a few weeks to see how good 6.0 and then jump directly to 6.0. 5.4 works for me without any problem since its release. This was not the case for earlier versions of this branch. Erich