Date: 06 Feb 2003 12:29:17 -0800 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Rm's 'man page': adding a mention of chflags, request Message-ID: <n13cn1dug2.cn1@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030206112454.68687593.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <5.1.1.2.2.20030205100345.046cc8f0@pop.qsi.net.nz> <20030204171243.5087ba49.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <fiu1fie73r.1fi@localhost.localdomain> <20030206112454.68687593.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On 05 Feb 2003 13:43:36 -0800 > swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) wrote: > > > > And maybe one for init(8) which explains how a "security level" can > > make it impossible to rm a file. chflags(1) doesn't mention security > > level either. (Please let me know if you do anything with this and > > I'll take it out of my long list of PRs to write.) > > > > Sure, I'll add it ;) I was about to suggest that you change init(8) to security(7), which I just re-discovered and which sounds like it would be a better "see also" for rm(1) and chflags(1). Unfortunately, security(7) only hints at the subject of unremovable files. I'll leave it to you to ask Matt Dillion if he would like to work on his manpage. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n13cn1dug2.cn1>