From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  3 11:37:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E3C82D;
 Fri,  3 Oct 2014 11:37:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84565E85;
 Fri,  3 Oct 2014 11:37:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id q108so751422qgd.25
 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 04:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=5u6xc3iJVpl9NFbT3osTumA3lv9PZIiZYArBG2nJ27Q=;
 b=AutpqVvF5pOdyOqDD3xk0auXWDxmfm43kKOqle0a5pTye4UEw28R36zlh8cYe3rE+1
 JmWkLeTNb7vh4qEql1lcVvIPkQhZYXWx7QKpW+pIRS6vnLHKgXk4kBzEH2ncW1S2tW4U
 IzA8w8ILbqrpcDW1770/hoaYBO6PEAmUU0Nv0juxJRrguCs07oV7T2zYgvAVMlH89nPO
 uQV0ll9xwapY1EEqtpHYcK5M97GLPl5nO/zWEn7YVhg9/IbLeFrPmcbsMOAvFMCV4pKH
 SA+m0Y0neVmtgPcfmCRk7B08o+JdxSDmFdaNJH9P9XqtsrNK2YLEqioCkpXJNqbtCzQW
 QBDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.100.68 with SMTP id x4mr2564430qcn.29.1412336230795;
 Fri, 03 Oct 2014 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: william88@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.43.161 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 04:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <542E677A.7080205@gmx.net>
References: <542E677A.7080205@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:37:10 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 51cBuUczSjSAwK3bOLXUdiWbYnY
Message-ID: <CAHtVNLNs_tm8cg6xu3N_DAQ8O=LPk3VOH_sAVp-nJgwQBniFkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: py-imaging vs. py-pillow
From: William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org>
To: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, mainland@apeiron.net,
 "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:37:13 -0000

Coexist how? They are essentially the same package. I don't see how
thats possible.

py-imaging is deprecated, they should be switched to py-pillow and thats it.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> wrote:
> According to freshports there are about 10 ports that depend on py-pilllow
> and 50 that depend on py-imaging.
>
> py-imaging conflicts with py-pilllow. E.g., calibre and xmbc cannot be
> installed at the same time.
>
>
> I noticed the problem because calibre switched to py-pilllow recently.
> There really should be a way that these packages can coexist.
>
> (py-imaging/py-pilllow maintainers CCed)
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



-- 
William Grzybowski / wg
FreeBSD Ports Committer