Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:17:30 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux Message-ID: <20080304081730.GA90914@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <200803041701.36466.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <20080303.224256.635730757.imp@bsdimp.com> <200803041701.36466.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2008-03-04 17:01, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > here's a set of diffs that will allow FreeBSD's usr.bin/make to build > > on Linux. I'm sure they are gross, and I don't plan to commit them > > (at least not all of them), but I thought I'd post them here to see > > what people think. > > > > I think that the extra config.h includes, the errc -> errx patches > > and the Makefile.dist patches may be good for the tree. The rest may > > not meet FreeBSD's source tree policies. > > > > Comments? > > I did this a while ago when porting some of our code to Linux because it > builds with pmake.. > > Your patches are much nicer than mine however :) > > The tailq stuff could be shoved into a linux.h or some such.. So it's > more obvious what it's for and why it's there. Solaris lacks TAILQ_xxx stuff too, so I would prefer something like "bsdcompat.h" or similar.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080304081730.GA90914>