From owner-cvs-all Sun Oct 4 13:43:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA23875 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA23811; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 13:43:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA09863; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Bill Fenner cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/unzip Makefile In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 04 Oct 1998 13:35:20 PDT." <199810042035.NAA03592@mango.parc.xerox.com> Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 13:42:52 -0700 Message-ID: <9860.907533772@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In message <199810041031.DAA16004@freefall.freebsd.org>you write: > > Make this work on the ALPHA > > I must be missing something - who sets MACHINE_ARCH? (In the RELENG_2_2 > *.mk files, the answer is "nobody".) Do you mean something more like: Argh, sorry, this is a 3.0-ism. Hmmm. Help, Satoshi! Since your stuff is sort of weirdly "cross branch" here, what's the canonical way of dealing with architecture specific changes in the ports collection? I don't expect this to come up a lot since few ports are like unzip, one which actually comes with i386 assembly files that it tries to use in the "freebsd" target case (otherwise it uses C versions which work fine on the alpha), but for when it does we should probably have a policy. - Jordan