From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 25 20:50:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA25590 for current-outgoing; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA25442; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA13102; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) To: Mark Mayo cc: Terry Lambert , "Rodney W. Grimes" , stesin@gu.net, ulf@Lamb.net, jhs@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, serious@FreeBSD.org, commercial@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Licensing Software In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Sep 1996 21:58:23 EDT." Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:48:02 -0700 Message-ID: <13100.843709682@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > viable *commercial* alternatives exist. I love my FreeBSD box more than > any other OS I've ever used, and I'd love nothing more than to be able to > Work on FreeBSD projects instead of NT. But right now FreeBSD doesn't pay, > cause it's not accepted in the commercial world, and that's where the jobs > and money comes from. Actually, that's not entirely true. I know of at least 4 open positions for FreeBSD programmers, if they'd only be willing to come out of the woodwork. AFAIK, every FreeBSD developer who actually wants a job has pretty much got one now, and those who aren't employed direcly in some FreeBSD related enterprise are generally constrained from doing so only by being unwilling to change locations. Most companies in the San Francisco Bay Area, for example, will currently be happy to welcome any number of competent engineers - there is a serious shortage of them around here! Resumes to me, please. :-) Jordan P.S. There's a "serious@freeBSD.org" mailing list? Really?! :-) Huh. I wonder when *that* got added!