Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:22:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch Message-ID: <bug-156226-2472-SAfvMwLXed@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226 --- Comment #6 from weberge42@gmail.com --- (In reply to eugen from comment #5) i know that link aggregation needs to configured on the switch(es) too. but i'm not talking about link aggregation - i'm (and the opener) are talking about simple failover supported by lagg(4): failover Sends traffic only through the active port. If the master port becomes unavailable, the next active port is used. The first interface added is the master port; any interfaces added after that are used as failover devices. without sending traffic from the host, traffic flow is only working again when the switch(es) update their tables. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-156226-2472-SAfvMwLXed>