From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 11 7:47:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kci.kciLink.com (kci.kciLink.com [204.117.82.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBB737C1B6 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:47:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kcilink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [204.117.82.2]) by kci.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DEBE8D2 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:47:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kcilink.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA77383; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:47:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from khera@kci.kcilink.com) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14699.13194.928908.864388@onceler.kcilink.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:47:38 -0400 (EDT) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Always use the 'make buildkernel' target to make yerkernels In-Reply-To: References: <396AB0AA.4A4436B8@cup.hp.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "KK" == Kris Kennaway writes: KK> support after the fact, and so people should be using the buildkernel KK> target if they want their kernel builds to work across upgrades. Which is a very different claim than saying you should *always* use buildkernel, and no other method is "supported". You're now qualifying your statement with "across upgrades". -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-545-6996 GPG & MIME spoken here http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message