From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 19 17:07:36 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA6A1065741;
	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org)
Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net
	[204.89.241.253])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E718C8FC13;
	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:07:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net
	[10.70.1.253])
	by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64335621C45;
	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:35 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net
Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD555621C44;
	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com
	(10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0;
	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:34 -0500
Message-ID: <4F184DD6.8010909@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:34 -0500
From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org>
Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
References: <4F159530.3030306@freebsd.org>
	<20120119170425.GD23733@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120119170425.GD23733@lonesome.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
	Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: ports/164244: multimedia/mplayer: last update
 (1.0.r20111218) conflicts with devel/ncurses
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:07:36 -0000



On 1/19/12 12:04 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> So if there's breakage, then it needs to be first understood, then
> dealt with.  If there is no other way than the horrible backout/PORTEPOCH
> dance, then so be it.
>
> But the takeaway is that we can't expect the PR submitters, or even
> port maintainers, to get anything right.  It sure makes life easier
> when they do, but we can't take it for granted.
>
and, in this case, maintainer is working on a fix as we speak.

> As committers, we are that QA step.
>
> mcl

-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

    * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
    * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
    * Hot Company Finalist 2011
    * Best Email Security Product
    * Certified SNORT Integrator