From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May  2 21:04:17 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA27488
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 2 May 1995 21:04:17 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA27470
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 2 May 1995 21:04:07 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA11410
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Tue, 2 May 1995 22:49:40 -0500
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA19737; 2 May 95 19:37:32 CDT (Tue)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA19734; Tue, 2 May 1995 19:37:31 -0500
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199505030037.TAA19734@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: Screen print capability
To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 19:37:30 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <9505021836.AA08106@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at May 2, 95 12:36:11 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 294       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The line between "security conscious" and "anal retentive" isn't that
> fine!  Come on, guys, get real!

Fair enough, and a feature that provides no more functionality than a
secure one, is hard to deal with reliably (what about typeahead?), and
is easily abused is definitely over the line.