From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 24 21:44: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC981594F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:43:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@rush.net) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA01488; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:53:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:53:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein To: vladimir@math.uic.edu Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris In-Reply-To: <19990825033510.26002.qmail@math.uic.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 25 Aug 1999 vladimir@math.uic.edu wrote: > >> Why would solaris machine make a request with vers=4: > >> galois.math.uic.edu -> galileo.math.uic.edu PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100021 (NLM) vers=4 proto=UDP > >> ? > >> (am I right that vers here is the same as the NFS version)? > > > >The NLM version 4 protocol is not supported, I am working on this. > > > >Question: did you delete both checks after the Solaris 2.5 mention? > >or just one? which one? > > > >-Alfred > > > > > > Ah, so vers=4 has nothing to do with NFS's vers 3. From reading the Open Group's XNFS book, NFSv3 clients use the NLM version 4 protocol to gain locks, FreeBSD's rpc.lockd doesn't have stub functions for NLMv4 locking _yet_ :) > > I have deleted both checks. > Interesting... > Please let me know if you need more info or testing done. Soon enough. :) thank you, -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@rush.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Wintelcom systems administrator and programmer - http://www.wintelcom.net/ [bright@wintelcom.net] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message