From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 15:22:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B238916DEC0 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B82B13C4A3 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anc ([200.152.88.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1LFMg3O043438 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:22:42 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:22:31 -0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702211322.31848.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: getting garbage faster using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:22:44 -0000 On Wednesday 21 February 2007 07:16, Ian Smith wrote: > =A0> It's primarily for item #1 that I hadn't mentioned this earlier, as = most > =A0> readers of -STABLE users are probably looking for a more scalable > solution. > > Scaleable? =A0Easy .. > > For 2.5" drives, a tack hammer does nicely. > For 3.5" to 5" drives, a claw hammer suffices. > For 14"? IBM disk packs a small sledge is optimal (if short of tanks!) guys I really enjoy this conversation! great stuff! I am just wondering why the "list sentinels" haven't mucked up yet ;) they= =20 almost shot at us for an issue much closer to the list subject. It was abou= t=20 spam and mail server so I am coming to the conclusion that the up-muckers=20 must be professional spammers which of course hate it when some discards=20 their tricks and they appearently are very interested in learning how to=20 destroy the evidence LOL ... or are they still under carnival-side-effects?= ?? here my contribution, even if most like the hard way, h2so4 would do it muc= h=20 smoother and has absolutely no scalability problems at all ;) and the=20 emergency package fit in the laptop case!=20 =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br