From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 14 13:54:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2F11583A for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 13:54:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id WAA19031; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:54:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? References: <5127.921359510@zippy.cdrom.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Mar 1999 22:54:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:11:50 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > > I was under the impression that we had gotten away from the point release > > after the 2.2.x releases. Either way, a 3.2 release 3 months after 3.1 > Just to correct this one, it's not that we've "gotten away" from point > releases so much as reassigned the meaning of them. Rather than doing > point releases as a matter of course, we'll now use them just for > serious bug fix / incremental release situations. Is this such a release, or should we call it 3.1.1 instead? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message