From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 6 11:45:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804E837B417 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:45:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrwbc55 ([204.127.198.44]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20020206194515.VOTF3578.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@rwcrwbc55> for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:45:15 +0000 Received: from [199.171.212.100] by rwcrwbc55; Wed, 06 Feb 2002 19:45:14 +0000 From: jordan.breeding@attbi.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Binutils fixed in -current? Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 19:45:14 +0000 X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Nov 29 2001) Message-Id: <20020206194515.VOTF3578.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@rwcrwbc55> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I read recently on this list that the problem with the -current binutils on Alphas had been fixed, did this also fix the problem on i386 which caused ports such as imlib, imlib2 and gnomelibs to behave weirdly as many of their binaries would segfault during configuring/linking/executing? I only ask because I would like to stop having to update my -current tree and then having to copy an old binutils over it so that things will work. Any information is appreciated. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message