From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 20:42:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600E9943; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF24F74; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-68-39-198-164.hsd1.de.comcast.net [68.39.198.164]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84E7DB993; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:42:04 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:16:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201211082303.qA8N3RlN031977@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <509D858C.6060005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201301111116.06531.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:42:04 -0500 (EST) Cc: Adrian Chadd , Chuck Burns X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:42:05 -0000 On Friday, November 09, 2012 05:47:43 PM Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns wrote: > > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line > > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal > > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G > > free on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so > > free, 512M ram.. just drop me a line.. > > Hi, > > Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the > cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a > cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential > diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each > little change that I do. > > I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small > handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just > that - build breaks. They're easily fixed. This is why I use p4 branches. I hack on my laptop and then commit it to p4 and use 'p4 sync' as a glorified rsync on development hosts. I can then do a full 'make tinderbox' before committing to HEAD after extracting the patches from p4 and applying them to an SVN checkout. SVN branches should let you do something similar as well (or just about any soure code control system you choose to use). -- John Baldwin