From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 7 09:17:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1214FEE2A for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DYNpT6rjyz3vhQ for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1l8gBr-000LFF-Iw; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 10:17:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:17:11 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Adam Jimerson Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question on figuring out category for new port Message-ID: References: <4858853.YNO7O01DYZ@heimdall> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4858853.YNO7O01DYZ@heimdall> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DYNpT6rjyz3vhQ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 09:17:22 -0000 Hi! > Hello so I was wanting to make a new port for python-adblock > (https://github.com/ArniDagur/python-adblock) so it can be added as a > dependency of www/qutebrowser but I'm not quite sure what is the correct > category for such a port. I can easily see it falling under net, net-mgmt, or > www although I'm thinking since it is browser related it would fall under www. > > I wanted to run this by the list to see which would be the better option. > Would www be the best option here? How is the blocking achieved ? Does it hook into the DNS lookups ? Does it parse webpages/javascript and detect patterns ? Does it use IP blacklists ? www sounds ok, or DNS, if it's DNS-based. net, if it uses IP blacklists. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?