From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 14 18:12:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA20484
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 18:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nic.follonett.no (nic.follonett.no [194.198.43.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA20474
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 1997 18:12:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nic.follonett.no (8.8.5/8.8.3) with UUCP id DAA19030; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 03:10:29 +0100 (MET)
Received: from oo7 (oo7.dimaga.com [192.0.0.65]) by dimaga.com (8.7.5/8.7.2) with SMTP id CAA20107; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 02:30:41 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970215023041.009fc2b0@dimaga.com>
X-Sender: eivind@dimaga.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 02:30:42 +0100
To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert)
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@dimaga.com>
Subject: AccelX (was Re: 2.2-GAMMA problems)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 06:48 AM 2/12/97 +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote:
>The "funny" part is I've been trying to install Linux on this machine (the
>guy has bought CDE and Xaccel for Linux so he wanted it) and to show him
>that it was not a machine's problem, I offered to install FreeBSD to show
>him it was much better... :-)

At least AccelX ships with both FreeBSD and Linux binaries in the same
tarball.  I haven't checked how CDE does it.

Just thought you'd like to know :)



Eivind Eklund  perhaps@yes.no  http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/
eivind@freebsd.org