Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:35:27 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> To: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade Message-ID: <20100106193527.GA44032@cons.org> In-Reply-To: <20100106163148.16247015@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <20100105200347.GA83318@cons.org> <4B43B621.6070600@FreeBSD.org> <20100105222134.GA18040@cons.org> <4B43C0F1.1060404@FreeBSD.org> <20100106163148.16247015@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Jennejohn wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:31:48PM +0100: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:45:05 -0800 > Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as > > > portupgrade is concerned. > > > > Sorry, I don't understand that sentence. > > > > I would guess this should read "will be left out of..." Follows logically > from his concern that there are no binary packages for -STABLE. Right. I meant going -stable will "lift me out of binary ports [support]". So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/ seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right? So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100106193527.GA44032>