From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:52:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A09B16A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail4out.barnet.com.au (mail4.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB1943CF6 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail4out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 529F437BB5B; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:51:55 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <457DEF1B00010C06494CB1@BarNet> Received: from mail4auth.barnet.com.au (mail4.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail4.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205454299AF; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:51:55 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (k7.mavetju.org [10.251.1.18]) by mail4auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9974F37B8BC; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:51:54 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5B4F9136; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:51:54 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:51:54 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20061211235154.GI90162@k7.mavetju> References: <20061211184753.3f1a8601@miwi.homeunix.org> <20061211231327.GA29664@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061211231327.GA29664@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vivek Khera Subject: Re: failure of policy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:52:56 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:13:27PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 01:23:54PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote: > > Reading this PR more closely it seems I was not even notified, as > > "Oleg Gawriloff" is described as the maintainer > > and is the one responding to maintainer queries, which he is not. > > What isn't detected well is if someone who isn't the maintainer submits > a PR with the 'maintainer-update' state. Edwin and I need to look at > our respective codebases and figure out what happened in this situation. As I explained to linimon on #bsdports, the original PR didn't get caught by the PR-assignment-software because it couldn't determine the ports name (it said slony1 instead of databases/slony1). So it got in a "tomorrow when I'm awake I'll look at it again" list (this happened in the middle of the night). When I woke up and checked the list, I saw that miwi already grabbed it and ignored it for the rest. Which is what I normally do when people take PRs before they are rescued. For people with access to freefall: tail -f /hub/g/hubgnats/gnats-aa/incoming-PRs/log/foo and you can see which ones are caught and which ones are not caught. If you hear a ^G, then it's one which is not caught. Fix the portname in the synopsis of the original email and bounce the email to gnats-aa at frietbsd dot gro (confused domain to prevent spammers, you can decode it easily if you need), and it might fix itself. Otherwise you will have to wait until I'm awake, or back from dayjob, beach, sun, surf etc. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/