From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 16:37:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495C116A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEAB43D31 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0CGeMEW031048; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:40:22 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j0CGeMJ2031047; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:40:22 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:40:22 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20050112164022.GD28786@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d01dLTUuW90fS44H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC wishlist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:37:37 -0000 --d01dLTUuW90fS44H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:12:01PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > > >>On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> > >>>On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > >>> > >>>>It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people a= re=20 > >>>>not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re@ approval) the fix &=20 > >>>>supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? > >>>> > >>> > >>>That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on >=20 > >>This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has >=20 > >I'm talking about 6-CURRENT. My last kernel/world build is >=20 > Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving this?=20 > Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not even on the=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list) No, because the project has no ability to "assign priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it won't. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --d01dLTUuW90fS44H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB5VL0XY6L6fI4GtQRAp7vAJ9sRoMmxVJoM4pH9I8EUEWhSqwqSgCg5xPN cNheJG2BpD0uutzdZgYgpLY= =7gNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d01dLTUuW90fS44H--