From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 30 22:54:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9C5106566B; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845B48FC27; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02815735A; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:54:28 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= soyeomul; bh=eQDsnj1pvapKtQsleSQvNSvF7yY3rI+UycBIVDdY1oc=; b=aIL HrvCtYRevsyT7hOP1jJrIZF08Ty8XEiiuUtqPygKpIcYUoPz8Akk0wDYFW64zwrS 83fFXyZHknRDsvi4eYEEFEHoyKVDDFxR31cWjR4R61/sJilqMUmc+xuVvZFhzXE2 Y3eaZG5Wd4aaFsa97P2NmYESsEZM3at8Wjsfk7Ow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=soyeomul; b=Hq +jq/lRLb/Gvi4hG7D12eidXcwLGsB0M6E6nZs7niKl7oy+3plUmRnlrg4QTJ0WZd YjABWBZxgoQluIR38oxi8F7Wx1tQ34VQaW9VnBdHRwB1G2R0XEfSsuaAY2jfLUF1 PAXI8Oj6LQfpwGSK5/b9InvaUn3zS4+sW/aZql56k= Received: from rhodo.izb.knu.ac.kr (rhodo.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f8:3::2]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8520357359; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:54:28 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by rhodo.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0881CD6F; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:54:24 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: Giorgos Keramidas Organization: DJ References: <86tz0upqfx.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> <87ljm6qi4j.fsf@kobe.laptop> <86vdl9yf8e.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:54:17 +0900 In-Reply-To: <86vdl9yf8e.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> (Byung-Hee HWANG's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:32:01 +0900") Message-ID: <867hxp4w9y.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE and Emacs port X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:54:31 -0000 Byung-Hee HWANG writes: > Giorgos Keramidas writes: > >> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:42:26 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: >>> Hello! A few hours ago, Chong Yidong, Emacs maintainer, has been >>> released Emacs 23.1 on gnu.org's mailing lists. Since i use Emacs as >>> default mailer, i really want that FreeBSD Project Release Team to add >>> Emacs 23.1 (Stable Ver.) into FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE. Because i use only >>> -RELEASE branch as far as i possibly can. Then i can use pkg_add >>> instead of ports, so easily. Thanks in advance ..;; >> >> Hi Byung-Hee, >> >> AFAIK, The ports are not frozen yet. I think we can make it by updating >> the port before this weekend. >> >> There is a bit of testing to make sure that we can repo-copy the >> editors/emacs port to editors/emacs22 and check that the new >> editors/emacs port for 23.1 works fine. >> >> I'm working on it, and I will post patches soon-ish :) > > Thanks, Giorgos! Let's fire Emacs gun! > > ... and following is somewhat off topic. FreeBSD Project's SPF rules > marked Giorgos's mail address (keramida@freebsd.org) as > "softfail". That's bad news to me. SPF [RFC4408] is Experimental draft, > you know. Actually Giorgos's mail is very healthy message. Hmm.. i > cannot understand why FreeBSD Project postmaster team adopted such lame > email policy. Please let's go with another policy (e.g., RFC4801). There > is good role model on RFC4801. The Python Project deployed RFC4801 rules > in their own mailing list server, as far as i know. And i heard that is > working very fine ... Oops, i made mistake. The above RFC4801 should be RFC4871. Sorry ;; -- "Sonny, you in there?" "Yeah, Tom, what is it?" -- Tom Hagen and Santino Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 28