From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 10 21: 6:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16CF37B719; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 21:06:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from mobile.wemm.org (mobile.wemm.org [10.0.0.5]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2B56Lp25717; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 21:06:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2B56Kh24437; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 21:06:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200103110506.f2B56Kh24437@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ps@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates In-Reply-To: <20010310184712H.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 21:06:20 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan Hubbard wrote: > From: "David O'Brien" > Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates > Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:43:52 -0800 > > > Why not add the softupdates option to newfs? Since newfs contains every > > tunefs option other than softupdates, I consider it a bug that newfs > > didn't gain that functionality when it was added to tunefs. > > I've no objection, but that's a bigger bikeshed. :) Kirk has given a thumbs up to change the tunefs option to a mount option.. There are patches around that already do this and have been "blessed" by Kirk. I seem to recall Paul Saab has a set for both -current and -stable. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message