From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 1 01:09:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C3837B401; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cus.org.uk (host213-106-240-81.no-dns-yet.ntli.net [213.106.240.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E3743FE5; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dom@cus.org.uk) Received: from cus.org.uk (localhost.cus.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by cus.org.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h6189I5h069147; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:09:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dom@cus.org.uk) Received: (from dom@localhost) by cus.org.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h6189IPf069146; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:09:18 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:09:18 +0100 From: Dominic Marks To: daichi Message-ID: <20030701080918.GA69070@cus.org.uk> References: <200306301406.h5UE6Zdd013151@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030630211935.GA71572@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030630220229.GA58820@cus.org.uk> <20030701001754.GA72598@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030701132632.2a5fb593.daichi@ongs.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030701132632.2a5fb593.daichi@ongs.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: daichi@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/dovecot pkg-install ports/mail/dovecot/files README.FreeBSD patch-dovecot-example.conf X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 08:09:21 -0000 On 01/07/2003 13:26, daichi wrote: > > > I'm a little confused. Does this apply for users and groups were the > > > actual numbers don't matter ? In Dovecot the extra user is just used > > > as a seperate identity to partition login, authentication and active > > > users securely. Or do should all users and groups which are going to > > > be added by a port by listed in the Porters Handbook. The handbook > > > itself seems to suggest the former. > > > > So there is nothing in the port or package that hard-codes the value > > of the uid at compile or package-time, for example files owned by the > > dovecot user? > > > > If not, it's probably OK. > > I think there is not uid/gid hard-code in dovecot ports. There isn't. > -- > Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi Thanks, -- Dominic