From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 26 15:27:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581D216A420
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:27:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from user@dhp.com)
Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCF043D55
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:27:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from user@dhp.com)
Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896)
	id EF1C031338; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:27:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:27:36 -0500 (EST)
From: user <user@dhp.com>
To: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?Arne_W=F6rner?= <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051126091438.4422.qmail@web30303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511261024290.8180-100000@shell.dhp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: remind me ... (file undelete on FreeBSD 5.4)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:27:39 -0000



On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Arne W=F6rner wrote:

> Hmm... I think there was such a problem before on a freebsd
> list...
>=20
> Did u tell your box to do "rm -rf local" or to do "rm -rf local/"?


Yes, that is exactly what I did - I autocompleted the symlink and it
deleted the target and left the symlink intact.  Is this expected, or
unexpected behavior ?


> In ports/sysutils/autopsy u might find a useful little helper...
> There was another tool, but I did not find it...


It's part of the sleuthkit.  I don't need a gui, so I think I will just
use the sleuthkit.

Thanks.