From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 1 9:42:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2874C37B423; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:42:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f51GgWG71846; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:42:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin To: Robert Watson Subject: Re: UFS large directory performance Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 01-Jun-01 Robert Watson wrote: > > This is great -- once I finish moving back to Maryland (sometime > mid-next-week) I'd be very interested in running this code on a -CURRENT > mock-up of my Cyrus server, which regularly runs with 65,000+ file > directories. I assume this is a -CURRENT patch set? > > (Mind you, I've found that most of the perceived "large directory > suffering" people tell me about is running ls with sorting enabled :-). You don't pipe ls(1) to sort(1)? :) -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message