From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 18:31:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC0D10656D0 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:31:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434118FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1RIVJPb054661; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:31:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1RIVDj4054658; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:31:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:31:13 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20080227183113.GA54600@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas , "M. Warner Losh" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jonathan+freebsd-hackers@hst.org.za References: <200802232322.45288.jonathan+freebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> <20080223.164806.-674897155.imp@bsdimp.com> <20080225203341.GA4150@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080225203341.GA4150@kobe.laptop> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jonathan+freebsd-hackers@hst.org.za Subject: Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:31:42 -0000 On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:33:41PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2008-02-23 16:48, "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > > This knee-jerk reaction against gnu find functionality baffles me. > > The changes are trivial and make FreeBSD more compatible. It is such > > an obvious no-brainer that I frankly didn't expect anybody to bat an > > eye. > > So should I expect similar knee-jerk reactions to the just committed > `finger compatibility' option to implement du -l for hardlinks? You added a new useful feature - and you based the option letter on prior-art (and resumable doen't conflict with POSIX). -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)