From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 22:05:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8107437B404 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net [203.16.214.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397DD43F85 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:05:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net) Received: from dungeon.home (ppp894.qld.padsl.internode.on.net [150.101.184.125])h5355ECT024208; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:35:14 +0930 (CST) Received: from dungeon.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dungeon.home (8.12.8p1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5355DCG009297; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:05:13 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from mckay) Message-Id: <200306030505.h5355DCG009297@dungeon.home> To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <14554.1054583409@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <14554.1054583409@critter.freebsd.dk> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at "Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:50:09 +0200" Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 15:05:13 +1000 From: Stephen McKay cc: ctm-users@FreeBSD.org cc: Stephen McKay Subject: Re: Numbering for cvs-cur X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 05:05:24 -0000 On Monday, 2nd June 2003, "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote: >In message <3EDBA820.8070703@math.missouri.edu>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith writes: >>A while back, someone (I forget who) suggested that I simply try the >>software out to see what would happen when the 4 digits run out for >>numbering the cvs-cur deltas. Well, I am happy to report that the >>programs seem to seemlessly switch to 5 digits. You should see this >>happen with cvs-cur sometime at the end of this year. The change should >>be largely transparent. (If a problem should later arise, I will deal >>with it then, probably by restarting at 100.) Ah, that would be me. I also read the code in case it was working just by chance (by overflowing buffers or similar) and my expectation is we should be able to go to about 10 digits, ie the limits of a signed 32 bit integer. Enough, I think. :-) >You guys have _no_ idea how amazed I am that this would ever become >an issue :-) It's hard to explain but it's just so handy having the source plop into my mailbox, even though it's been a long time since I've had to use a dialup modem. Comfy like an old shoe! ;-) Stephen.