From owner-freebsd-config Wed Mar 3 2:43:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAE314F20 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 02:43:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from tdx.co.uk (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA32239; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:42:43 GMT Message-ID: <36DD1223.9B5C6B11@tdx.co.uk> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 10:42:43 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz Organization: TDX - The Digital eXchange X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Young Cc: freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: menuconfig References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Steven Young wrote: > Well, what I was actually meaning was a kernel configuration utility, > not an overall system configuration utility. My general plan is to have > spec file of some sort that describes all the different options that can > be in the config file and how they relate to each other. Thus, when a new > option is added to the kernel, you just have to add a couple of lines to > the spec file and voila. > > Steve (my first 10 minutes running qmail - hope this gets through!) Hi, OK - I thought you were referring to 'system config'... I still like the Kernel config idea though! :-) Again, the only problem I can see is making sure it stays up to date... I guess for -release versions it's not too bad, but staying current with -current could be fun :-) Still sounds like a good idea though! -Kp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-config" in the body of the message