From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 21:18:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB91316A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:18:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D2243D48 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:18:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so2272816rng for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DK6rvdnxp2c5TH+TlaLL6fEhlYIP2x0Yg2xxgjOxT0qebr9B0FUMw9gPnMIwv/8xJGwXKZUrSLIhN2RqoyOQMYj1PHP34cCUscywz3WQuOacuIP/EPaHgbN6MS1NClLF2vz/GBfC4g2e7Q4cF716IiUs8Mkim+ewmIh7WPX/v70= Received: by 10.38.86.71 with SMTP id j71mr1660773rnb; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.149.57 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:18:23 +0200 From: Claus Guttesen To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: apple moving to x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Claus Guttesen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:18:24 -0000 Hi. I know this is a bit off-topic but it will probably have some impact on the ongoing work with FreeBSD. As most know by now Apple will base it's next-generation hardware on the x86-architecture moving away from the PowerPC. My hope is that Apple will take the direction away from Darwin and the Mach-kernel and adopt a more stock FreeBSD userland and kernel. FreeBSD may already benefit from some of the work done or funded by Apple but it would be easier to integrate new functionality (in both directions) if Apple were to base it's OS XI on a Apple-tuned but otherwise GENERIC kernel. Claus