From owner-freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 12:52:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CC599C256 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edelwin@mailoo.org) Received: from mailoo.org (arnold.mailoo.org [212.83.147.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A643D15AF for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edelwin@mailoo.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by arnold.mailoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C671E7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:53:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.27.8.2] (pangea.random.sh [212.83.168.157]) by arnold.mailoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241421A7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:53:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Concerning our new Code of Conduct... To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org References: From: Edelwin Khaelos Message-ID: <55A7A913.40801@mailoo.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:52:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:52:56 -0000 >> There are approximately 400 active committers, and not even five of >> those are women. How the *hell* can you claim to be discriminated >> against when you are part of a 99% majority? >> > > So you are saying that one person can't complain against other person > actions/behaviour strictly because it is part of some majority? That's like > very sexist (given we're talking about being male/female here) and > discriminative (in general) thing since you're denying him the same rights > simply because he's a male. > > I think that's realy bad thing. Congratulations, you totally missed the point :) You are saying that a person belonging to a *ruling* majority is being discriminated against in their own ruling majority by a concept which denounces a whiny and hypocrite behaviour (male tears: when a member of this ruling majority tries ‑unsuccessfully‑ to impersonate an oppressed minority when their ruling position is in jeopardy). (good luck in you life, by the way, because this kind of behaviour only works on the Internet… or at least that's what you thought ;)