From owner-freebsd-qa Fri Mar 10 17:13:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mail.twave.net (twave.net [206.100.228.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5145137BF64 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:13:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brameld@twave.net) Received: from [208.47.188.33] by mail.twave.net (NTMail 3.03.0018/1.abwg) with ESMTP id ga101588 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:13:14 -0500 Received: from Bozo_3.BozoLand.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Bozo_3.BozoLand.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA00377; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:13:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brameld@twave.net) From: Walter Brameld To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Feedback on 4.0-RC3 (mostly good! :) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:11:30 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Shaun (UNIX)" , John Reynolds , qa@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00031020130904.00247@Bozo_3.BozoLand.domain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, in a never-ending search for enlightenment, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Walter Brameld wrote: > > > I wonder about other nit-picky things, like why is sound.doc (to > > which I've seen numorous RTFM references) still written for > > configurations under FreeBSD 2.1 ? > > Because no-one has rewritten it? > > Kris Yeah, I'll buy that. Now I gather it was not written by the commiters and it's not their responsibility (?) to rewrite it. But is there any point in keeing it? -- Walter Brameld Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? Walter: Where the hell am I? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message