From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  9 02:18:19 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BABB16A494;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2006 02:18:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jd@ugcs.caltech.edu)
Received: from groat.ugcs.caltech.edu (groat.ugcs.caltech.edu
	[131.215.176.110])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E619543D8B;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2006 02:18:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jd@ugcs.caltech.edu)
Received: by groat.ugcs.caltech.edu (Postfix, from userid 3640)
	id 398945880B; Thu,  8 Jun 2006 19:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:18:18 -0700
From: Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu>
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060609021818.GH28128@groat.ugcs.caltech.edu>
References: <20060608132048.GD86198@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<20060608174113.GC1075@roadrunner.q.local>
	<4488CCC7.4040500@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4488CCC7.4040500@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: jd@ugcs.caltech.edu
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Data authentication for geli(8) committed to HEAD.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 02:18:19 -0000

>From Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:20:07PM -0700:
> 3. Implement some kind of sector-level journaling, again the performance 
> is likely to suffer a great deal due to seeks.
Right.  This is certainly a case where background fsck is useless and much of 
the theory of softupdates generally is wrong.

Just one more nail to seal the fate of softupdates.

                     Paul