Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:38:03 -0800 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.berkeley.edu> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How can I post a pr when my IP can't be reverse-resolved? Message-ID: <20021215003803.GA13126@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20021215002117.GB5083@gothmog.gr> References: <3DFA09A2.C5B0103B@mindspring.com> <3DFB13B9.B185DCD0@softweyr.com> <20021214122121.GA16263@gothmog.gr> <20021214210507.GA12180@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20021215002117.GB5083@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.ORG>: > Email is easier to track though. And measures *can* be taken. > Anyway, I'm not entirely against moderation for PRs submitted through > email too. Right now, this is not one of my problems though. My most > serious concern is implementing something that makes moderation > possible, and not choosing whether it be used for email only or web > only or both. Assuming that all committers can approve PRs, the delay ought to be a few hours at best, and that's acceptable. What's not acceptable is to use the feature as a quality control mechanism, rather than as an abuse-control mechanism. Otherwise, you would be making the system closed, and at that point we might as well be writing the next version of Solaris or Windows. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021215003803.GA13126>