From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr  2 23:12:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA02408
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 23:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA02397;
          Wed, 2 Apr 1997 23:12:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.5/8.7.3) id JAA08723; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:11:07 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Søren Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk>
Message-Id: <199704030711.JAA08723@ravenock.cybercity.dk>
Subject: Re: ufs lock panic in -current
In-Reply-To: <199704022302.QAA14842@phaeton.artisoft.com> from Terry Lambert at "Apr 2, 97 04:02:31 pm"
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:10:58 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, terry@lambert.org, phk@critter.dk.tfs.com,
        ache@nagual.ru, dyson@FreeBSD.org, bde@zeta.org.au,
        current@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to Terry Lambert who wrote:

> > No, no, just upload them *now* please!  Phk is already more than
> > familiar with the degree of target movement involved, and putting them
> > up for public display is precisely where you've waffled out on this
> > issue *every single time* it's come up.  If you don't want to release
> > your bits, fine, but then kindly *stop* talking about how reluctant we
> > are to integrate them everytime someone so much as gives you an
> > opening!  You can't have it both ways, OK?  Please, just take phk up
> > on his offer and ** upload your changes *** so that we can maybe even
> > get *past* this "2 year's worth of delay" you keep talking about.
> > Don't make it 3 years through your own initiative now, eh? :-)

[Alot of Terry bla bla deleted]
 
> I'd rather have no editiorial criticism than destructive editorial
> criticism, thank you.  Giving you the changes incrementally seems
> to be the only reliable way to achieve this.

So again Terry exactly WHEN do we get the first chunk then ??

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt               (sos@FreeBSD.org)               FreeBSD Core Team
                Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..