From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 02:31:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED51C16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:31:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E09343D45; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:31:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1H2VgSX081773; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:31:43 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <43F5358E.2080408@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:31:42 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050928 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20060215024339.N22450@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <43F29BF5.4060300@freebsd.org> <20060216140725.T23429@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060217013427.GB31540@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060217013427.GB31540@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dmitry Pryanishnikov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual memory consumption (both user and kernel) in modern CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:31:46 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Note that only 200K of extra memory is used. Using 50MB of virtual > address space is not going to cause any problems unless the pages are > touched, which as you can see from the resident size, they aren't. > See also the old "omg, rpc.statd has as size of 256MB" entry in the > FAQ. > > Kris The problem I know is .core file is too big for a very tiny program.