Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:54:29 +0200 From: claudiu vasadi <claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can pf block a string ? or better, to limit it ? Message-ID: <AANLkTikkFcAeSGKjQ93J7cTL32EUQ_V7alWz-g1GE0ZJ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <010101cb1358$d92b3b50$8b81b1f0$@org> References: <AANLkTima26GreX5jtmdJiR2FbNiB5O4ixN92oqxktTmb@mail.gmail.com> <7114830758496124649@unknownmsgid> <AANLkTimN_9x-cQiF12bQdIjtHa7BjM6kMoEfsjcjcKLH@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinCwonuSkfbLIWfHYW53jyIC4zWNxReA4Fmn5Kh@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilBWj_tA7-ECbzKLz3hkZDPwo6HmBWnRe-yiS_K@mail.gmail.com> <010101cb1358$d92b3b50$8b81b1f0$@org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
@Peter Maxwell: kernel coding is too much for me @Michael proto: nstreams ... reading about it @Vlad Galu: STATEFUL TRACKING OPTIONS has nothing to do with "string matching". I want to bock a particular string (ex: "test") and not filter by S/SA or other tcp flags @john: I was thinking about something similar I will let you know once I finish reading and testing. thx for your opinions and more are welcomed :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikkFcAeSGKjQ93J7cTL32EUQ_V7alWz-g1GE0ZJ>