From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Aug  5 10:23:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24427
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 10:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from doormat.epower.net (doormat.epower.net [207.16.212.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA24422
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from elliots@localhost) by doormat.epower.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) id MAA14405; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:28:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:28:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Elliot Smorodinsky <elliots@epower.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Popper question.
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970805122104.14331A-100000@doormat.epower.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


	Is FreeBSD's version of popper sucseptible to the attack described 
in "ftp://info.cert.org/pub/cert_advisories/CA-97.09.imap_pop"? I am one 
of the system administrators for Eclipse America Corporation, and since 
one of our mailservers runs FreeBSD (runs an entirely too old version of 
freebsd, but that's neither here nor there), I'm quite understandably 
concerned.

	Thank you very much, and I look fdorward to hearing from you.

	--Elliot Smorodinsky