From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 08:00:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5290916A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 08:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from cpanel10.gzo.com (69-56-171-54.theplanet.com [69.56.171.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5808743D31 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 08:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dany_list@natzo.com) Received: from [12.146.133.135] (helo=natzo.com) by cpanel10.gzo.com with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.24) id 1AdX9q-0005Zz-7W; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 10:00:46 -0600 Message-ID: <3FF98AC9.4060701@natzo.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:03:21 -0500 From: Dany User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stijn Hoop References: <3FF95CBD.8060304@natzo.com> <20040105130220.GL74113@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040105130220.GL74113@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel10.gzo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - natzo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD AGP or Nvidia AGP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:00:52 -0000 That's a good idea but if I do that I will be missing the cool screensavers using OpenGL ;) Stijn Hoop wrote: >On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:46:53AM -0500, Dany wrote: > > >>What is the preferred method ? .... The one that would give the most >>stability (I don't really care about performance and fps). >> >> > >Just one thought: if you don't want 3D support, just go with the 2D >'nv' driver -- that should be stable. > >--Stijn > > >