From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 22 01:38:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98761065672; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com (hapkido.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE98FC08; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.66]) by hapkido.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEC617C5D0; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C451D10060; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsdlab.fbsdsecure.org (c-76-21-169-24.hsd1.va.comcast.net [76.21.169.24]) (Authenticated sender: trhodes@fbsdsecure.org) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA2201005D; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:15:14 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Doug Barton Message-Id: <20100721211514.0f28fff7.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C463E5F.2030308@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100717105658.GV1742@hoeg.nl> <4C461CA5.2040307@FreeBSD.org> <4C462E31.4030801@FreeBSD.org> <4C463E5F.2030308@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: glarkin@freebsd.org, jos@catnook.com, rc@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, ed@80386.nl Subject: Re: General note on rc scripts and daemonizing X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:38:11 -0000 Hey, On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:25:03 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote: > > Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor > > a la daemontools. > > That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to > actually do that work we need to deal with what we have. > > I wrote one. It's in the latest status report that, I gues, will be released soon. :) -- Tom Rhodes