From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 11:41:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F210D2E for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53CB02547 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33420E08 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:41:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=s2OK+eSnpWxF2dLz5i17R3E1lo0=; b=hgQnM TxaMJKGB45OkD/3Jhusa0uBn/1raXEIBYrBSRAP5Havx9bu4SlsKNqqkt3PFtcV9 Fly+u9aW+7xRTAqinDSAi6KY7GW2vIgS8pcAecRQ0Pj15nTbKMgz2C82WPa83Dm1 8rkDBbFtv49ivpnx82RDMJYo/x4fKEltMNxzWM= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id B6735B02388; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1377171693.8666.12828877.1913470C@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: q/WHo3R4Smq0VYMOMRvMrquTzXAZKL6IvYhhJ3C+VnCr 1377171693 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d009844e Subject: Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES" Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130821230934.778ea95b@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20130821223937.30d7e266@gumby.homeunix.com> <521534C9.3090207@bsdforen.de> <20130821230934.778ea95b@gumby.homeunix.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:41:35 -0000 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200 > Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > > On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote: > > > The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos > > > suggest adding the line: > > > > > > fusefs_enable="YES" > > > > > > to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything > > > since the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected > > > such a file to load the fuse kernel module which I'm having to load > > > myself. > > > > The file is there. fusefs-kmod > > I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better judgement, > I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS work. It looks > like fuse has been moved into the base system, but /etc/rc.d/ hasn't yet > been updated to reflect that. > There isn't an /etc/rc.d/ for every kernel module. If you want to use fuse on FreeBSD 10 and later just put fuse_load="YES" in loader.conf. The rc.d script in the port was just a nice courtesy. I don't think it's likely we'll see an /etc/rc.d/fuse script appear in the base system.