Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:11:15 -0000
From:      Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
To:        Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
Cc:        Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@freebsd.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148
Message-ID:  <5009BD6C.9050301@missouri.edu>
Resent-Message-ID: <20120812231108.GG20453@server.rulingia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120721032448.X5744@besplex.bde.org>
References:  <20120714120432.GA70706@server.rulingia.com> <20120717084457.U3890@besplex.bde.org> <5004A5C7.1040405@missouri.edu> <5004DEA9.1050001@missouri.edu> <20120717200931.U6624@besplex.bde.org> <5006D13D.2080702@missouri.edu> <20120718205625.GA409@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <500725F2.7060603@missouri.edu> <20120719025345.GA1376@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <50077987.1080307@missouri.edu> <20120719032706.GA1558@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5007826D.7060806@missouri.edu> <5007AD41.9070000@missouri.edu> <20120719205347.T2601@besplex.bde.org> <50084322.7020401@missouri.edu> <20120720035001.W4053@besplex.bde.org> <50085441.4090305@missouri.edu> <20120720162953.N2162@besplex.bde.org> <20120720184114.B2790@besplex.bde.org> <50097128.6030405@missouri.edu> <20120721032448.X5744@besplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce, with both of us working at the same time on clog, it is getting 
hard for me to follow.  The version I sent this morning is the last 
change I made.

How about if you come the owner of the code for a while.  When you are 
finished, send it back to me, and I will look over everything you have 
done.  I won't work on it until then.  This works for me in other ways 
too, because my life is very busy at the moment.

If I do work on code, it will be on casinh/casin.  I am looking over the 
paper by Hull et al, and I am learning a lot from it.  One thing I did 
realize - casin and casinh are essentially the same.  If
#define reverse(z) cpack(cimag(z),creal(z))
then casin(z) = reverse(casinh(reverse(z))).  Unfortunately it is not so 
nice for cacos/cacosh.

I do like the progress we are making, and I appreciate your help very much.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5009BD6C.9050301>