From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 8 11:25:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B93106566C for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594FA8FC1E for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so1236972ika.3 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XRw9pDcmOe+zWxQZIjnI8A+Iur9wleac2ivIJrkg5GU=; b=MPUfR3qjOQBEvjBrvUTrcpMnBC7fw8n3IuJaVXXszJK/SAs4JRAtnQkqtnoFopzumU uuugC+ae1+HseKjpoGr0Hm42BKyKEu66pr/97yCCE2xrM9dikkVWc0BJwy0NzdTdsuhE SwfTJpFb0b23ep1CgIu+SgdC63q5SaN7OqoNA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=mQKyiNi5d6xtz100XuyvahVW537kY15L2tZnsdQqz5fvO/pP/DvWK/ai/G312sdMJW lwXdVj4ACPmur5hDWtvF6nUzprTPvExROm3aI4xQn757NTmhS6vCnyuDPoqkaDGy/E+Q cnEmkblHtElDXK6mzdXqCHMnrjbfBPrfPGe7Y= Received: by 10.210.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr1908332ebb.68.1212924305935; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from logik.internal.network ( [81.86.41.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g11sm12551883gve.8.2008.06.08.04.25.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by logik.internal.network (Postfix, from userid 11001) id 577175CBE; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:25:00 +0100 From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com To: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <20080608112500.GA16328@logik.internal.network> References: <20080608103254.GA99569@logik.internal.network> <4D5B525988E448B4BB66F447AE53347A@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D5B525988E448B4BB66F447AE53347A@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpd jail problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:25:08 -0000 On 20080608 12:19:23, Steven Hartland wrote: > I assume as it would effect the entire machine and hence should be run > on the base machine instead, not the jail? I think you might've misunderstood. The ntpd I'm running on the host syncs the clock (and therefore the whole machine), the ntpd in the jail just publishes the time for the network (doesn't affect the clock). The problem is that the ntpd in the jail seems to believe that the host clock is out of sync (from what I can gather), even though it isn't.