From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 16:28:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9103106566B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751768FC08 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S8DXT-0002K7-BB; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:28:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:28:31 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Mark Felder Message-ID: <20120315162831.GQ44287@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p0f v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 -0000 Hi! > Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at > detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher > than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP, > which is causing spam filter accuracy issues. > > I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port > does not have a maintainer. As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable. I'll give it a try. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go !