From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 15 16:28:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9103106566B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751768FC08
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
	id 1S8DXT-0002K7-BB; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:28:31 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:28:31 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-ID: <20120315162831.GQ44287@home.opsec.eu>
References: <op.wa58zste34t2sn@tech304>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <op.wa58zste34t2sn@tech304>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: p0f v3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 -0000

Hi!

> Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at  
> detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher  
> than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP,  
> which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.
> 
> I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port  
> does not have a maintainer.

As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable.

I'll give it a try.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         8 years to go !