From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 10 22:43:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA15924 for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 22:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (root@grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA15919 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 22:43:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA01915; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 08:42:26 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199602110642.IAA01915@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host mark@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Ollivier Robert cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 08:42:25 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ollivier Robert wrote: > The problem I have with Kerberos is that it does not -- to my knowledge -- > encrypt everything from a telnet session. So trafic from any X11 program > you start on the other side will not be encrypted. Not true. the -x switch turns on encryption. > SSH does it _automatically_. When you think about it, if you were looking > for a reason to use it over Kerberos, you just got it. Sure - with secure telnet you have to _ask_ for encryption. Its not difficcult to put into appropriate startup files. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key