Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:14:58 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports tree is already up to date. Message-ID: <47012B12.9050305@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.10.01.16.43.09@sremick.net> References: <94136a2c0710010907t188fe01ana85ae9ba7f478065@mail.gmail.com> <pan.2007.10.01.16.43.09@sremick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott I. Remick wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > >> Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the >> last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. >> Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? > > You're not the only one. I just hopped on here to check to see if there > was any mention of a ports freeze that I missed. Figure 6.3 is just > around the corner...maybe? I suppose it's possible, or 7.0 as Eric suggests, but refer to recent ports@ posts regarding autoconf failures; just speculation on my part, but it could have something to do with the effect you have noticed. "'Tis a puzzlement!" Kevin Kinsey -- The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what you want. -- D. Cohen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47012B12.9050305>