Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:09:13 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Skvortsov <skv@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/bugzilla Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/bugzilla3 Makefile distinfo ports/russian Makefile ports/russian/bugzilla-ru Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/russian/bugzilla3-ru Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20110608080913.GA68482@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DEF2CBD.7000509@FreeBSD.org> References: <201106071330.p57DU1Ys079275@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110608015327.GA62200@FreeBSD.org> <4DEF2CBD.7000509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:03:09PM +0400, Sergey Skvortsov wrote: > On 08.06.2011 5:53, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > `russian/bugzilla-ru' and `russian/bugzilla3-ru' should be renamed to > > just `russian/bugzilla' and `russian/bugzilla'. Seriously, what people > > are thinking when adding foobar-<lng> to <language> category? Doing > > make -V PKGNAME in such ports should convince those who still do not > > understand what is the problem with carelessly chosen port names. > > 1. 'bugzilla-ru' reflects project name on Source Forge. > > 2. It is standard way for naming localization packages in Bugzilla project. Bugzilla folks can name their packages as they wish, and it may certainly make sense in their environment, but these naming scheme brings annoying redudancy within *our* ports tree, and should be adjusted accordingly. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110608080913.GA68482>