From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 23:11:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2342316A415 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outP.internet-mail-service.net (outP.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34CB13C461 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from shell.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.47.20) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:53:15 -0800 Received: from [10.251.18.229] (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l05NBFVL078286; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:11:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Message-ID: <459EDB0B.1050804@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:11:07 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <20070105123127.gnk0v58p44488g48@webmail.ntnu.no> <4085.1167997049@critter.freebsd.dk> <20070105184621.dh8kgoy7ko4gk4gc@webmail.ntnu.no> <20070105102905.A91349@xorpc.icir.org> <20070105212543.GA8574@heave.ugcs.caltech.edu> <20070105145915.B94175@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20070105145915.B94175@xorpc.icir.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lulf@stud.ntnu.no, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Paul Allen , Ivan Voras , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pluggable Disk Schedulers in GEOM X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:11:21 -0000 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:25:43PM -0800, Paul Allen wrote: orant of I/O that > > this was also on 4.11 which probably does not use softupdates. yes it does.. Doesn't have UFS2 and snapshots however. > > that does not mean that a scheduler is useless in general. > in fact, what i find questionable is hardwiring unnecessary > (in the sense that they are done only for performance reasons) > ordering constraints in the layers above. I cannot comment for > the disk, but e.g. for the process scheduler there are priority > updates in many places depending on what the process is doing. > > cheers > luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"