Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:37:54 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> Cc: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mutt was a failure, alternatives? Message-ID: <20140404183754.6954522f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140402060422.GA25437@SDF.ORG> References: <20140402051254.GA20229@SDF.ORG> <20140402131849.6ec27474@X220.alogt.com> <20140402060422.GA25437@SDF.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 06:04:23 +0000, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:18:49PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:12:55 +0000 > > Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> wrote: > > > > > hello, > > > my attempt at compiling mutt with sasl support was > > > a major failure. > > > may i know the usual approach used for email under > > > freebsd 10? > > > > I use Claws-Mail under X. > > ah, okay, i was looking for a command line alternative. :) > > do people still go for the seperated mta + mua approach? At least I do. Even though my primary mail client is running on X - it's Sylpheed -, I can also use (al)pine as a text mode client. MTA is sendmail. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140404183754.6954522f.freebsd>