From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 23:01:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC6616A4CE; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B550643D3F; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) iBUN29tr040727; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:02:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20041230215331.GA29414@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041230195320.GA91304@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041230203049.GA11245@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041230211112.GA20159@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041230215331.GA29414@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Yc6oHozh8vost3GTdbYv" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:01:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1104447677.8767.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: netchild@FreeBSD.org cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux vs freebsd fc-cache binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:01:34 -0000 --=-Yc6oHozh8vost3GTdbYv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 13:53 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 04:14:40PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > * Find someone that can create a RedHat 8 RPM of freetype2-2.1.4 or > > higher (preferably 2.1.7). I'm sure one of our users could do this, an= d > > it wouldn't hurt to ask. >=20 > Would 2.1.9 not work? 2.1.9 would work, but we have not updated due to the API changes. Therefore, I haven't tested 2.1.9 to know if its rendering style will be uglier than 2.1.7. If someone can produce a 2.1.9 RPM, and it renders decent fonts, then by all means, go for it. Joe >=20 > Kris --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-Yc6oHozh8vost3GTdbYv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB1Ii9b2iPiv4Uz4cRAjKMAKCOGt5gbU9UtkIaatKVLpPe3K2z+wCgk8tr qQfpRMDySfliDeMq+IWvRZE= =e5yh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Yc6oHozh8vost3GTdbYv--